Has Obama’s Syrian debacle increased the prospects of an Israeli strike on Iran?


Never mind the chemicals. What about Syria’s Bio-Weapons?

Editor’s Note…

With all the recent chatter about “nerve gas” , no one has said anything about Syria’s Massive stockpiles of bio-weapons. Perhaps this explains Assad’s apparent willingness to allegedly disarm of his chemical stockpiles .This way he can “comply with the international norms” while maintaining WMD deterrence. Meanwhile, as the Western strike force for Syria disperses, Assad has begun setting conditions for the disarmament deal, like guarantees for non-intervention by the U.S. and similar steps he claims Israel should be making with regards to Chemical weapons – a clear way to refrain from fulfilling his alleged commitments in that respect,while enabling Russia and Iran maintain their upper hand vs. the buffoonish Obama regime. Maybe NATO will come up with some sort of bio false flag next time ? This latest debacle also buys time for the Iranian nukes because they’ll be able to use the same methodology while maintaining their core capacities, and Obama will be able to say he complied with Netanyau’s concept of disarming a regime from WMD’s by posing a “credible military threat”, without actually doing anything.

For this reason, many analysts believe the chances of a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran have doubled following Obama’s Syrian debacle vis a vis Putin. The Americans have swayed the Israelis back from doing just that so far, by convincing them that breaking the Shiite axis should commence from Damascus. This strategy never made any sense because even in the unlikely event that Assad would be removed by them, it would not get Iran to abandon its nuclear program, but to accelerate it at full pace, knowing they will be the next target.The present nullification of the American military option in Syria may finally get the Israelis to sober up from the Obama delusion and take care of the problem by themselves.  


Washington Free Beacon

As the Obama administration considers a plan to confiscate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s chemical weapons stash, lawmakers and experts are warning that the regime still has an ample supply of highly dangerous biological weapons.

Sen. John Cornyn (R., Texas) urged Secretary of State John Kerry in a letter sent Friday to ensure that any deal to disarm Assad includes his biological weapons stores, which likely include various neurotoxins and deadly viruses.

Kerry is in Geneva for a series of meetings with his Russian counterpart on a proposal to move some 1,000 tons of chemical weapons out of Syria.

Cornyn told Kerry that biological weapons are just as dangerous and destructive as chemical weapons, which Assad is believed to have used against rebel fighters and civilians.

“Bioweapons also constitute weapons of mass destruction and, for decades, the government of Syria has pursued this capability to complement its massive chemical weapons arsenal,” Cornyn wrote. “I urge you to ensure Syria’s biological weapons are included as an equal component of any plan.”

Cornyn said that while he remains “highly skeptical of Russia’s true intentions” in proposing a plan to disarm its ally Assad, he believes that “omitting Assad’s bioweapons from any agreement would represent a gaping hole in the plan and would not adequately protect U.S. national security interests.”

Bioweapons could easily fall into the hands of al Qaeda terrorists and other extremists who could then transfer them out of the country.

“Assad’s bioweapons, either in his hands or the hands of terrorists, represent a direct security threat to the U.S. and our allies,” Cornyn wrote. “In many ways, bioweapons can be easier to hide, transport, and employ than chemical weapons, making them a potentially even graver threat.”

The Iranian terror group Hezbollah could use these weapons to attack Americans and other Western targets.

“If weaponized biological agents, their component materials, or even technical manuals were to fall into the hands of Hezbollah or another terrorist group, this would be a direct threat to the U.S. and our allies, particularly Israel,” Cornyn wrote. “For example, one small vial of Anthrax employed effectively could inflict devastation on any American city.”

U.S. intelligence agencies are confident that Assad has produced various biological weapons and has an active research program underway.

“Based on the duration of Syria’s longstanding biological warfare (BW) program, we judge that some elements of the program may have advanced beyond the research and development stage and may be capable of limited agent production,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper wrote in an unclassified April report.

“Syria is not known to have successfully weaponized biological agents in an effective delivery system, but it possesses conventional and chemical weapon systems that could be modified for biological agent delivery,” Clapper concluded.

Former U.S. officials have also provided a detailed accounting of Assad’s biological weapons capabilities.

Anthony Cordesman, a former director of intelligence assessment in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, noted in a 2008 report that Assad is believed to have “an offensive biological weapons effort.”

Assad was known to have an “extensive [bioweapons] research effort” at the time the report was published. Evidence indicated there was at least “one underground facility” and another “near the coast.”

These facilities were believed to have a “production capability for anthrax and botulism, and possibly other agents,” Cordesman wrote in the report, which was published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

“Israeli sources claim Syria weaponized botulinum and ricin toxins in the early 1990s, and probably anthrax,” according to the report.

There were also “limited indications” that Assad “may be developing or testing biological variations on ZAB-incendiary bombs and PTAB-500 cluster bombs and Scud warheads.”